DC Train Crash
Horrific story from the evening commute here in DC. One Red Line Metrorail train slammed into another, plowing into it from behind with enough force to launch it up on top of the other train. The Washington Post is reporting at least 6 deaths and an estimated 70 injuries. The collision happened between two stations just south of the border between DC and Maryland. No idea yet what caused the accident.
But it’s already clear that as in most sizeable emergencies, regular people did the hardest work in the most important moments--before rescue workers arrived. Getting out of a wrecked subway train is extremely difficult. Between the darkness (due to the loss of power) and the twisted cage of metal, it is very hard to get oriented.
It doesn’t help that subway cars in general are challenging to evacuate. If you’ve ever looked at the instructions for escaping from a Metro train, you’ll see what I mean. It involves finding the center door, lifting the cover of an emergency door-release handle, pulling the lever and then sliding open the LEFT (not right) door. If you want to know more, you can check out this very irritating Flash animation on the WMATA site. As with many of the announcements on the Metro, a good deal of time is spent telling you to listen to the people in charge (even though, in major emergencies, the people in charge are unlikely to be able to help you for a good long while).
One eye witness told the Washington Post that people inside one of the wrecked cars were beating on the windows, trying to get out. Many were on their cell phones. As is so often the case in disasters, people did remarkable things for one another. Survivors report fear, confusion and kindness--but not panic:
“In the moments after the crash, passengers made tourniquets out of T-shirts, struggled to pull debris off others and sought to calm the hysterical and the gravely wounded. Inside the worst-hit car, waiting on ambulances and the “jaws of life,” an Anglican priest led a group in the Lord’s Prayer. On the ground below, a civilian Pentagon employee told a wounded girl he wouldn’t accept her last wish—she was going to live.”
I’m struck by the similarities to the behavior of passengers in London after the 7/7 transit bombings in 2005. This description is from the foreword to the invaluable Report of the 7 July Review Committee:
“What is clear is that the humanitarian response to these events was astounding; from the passengers who helped and supported each other, to the underground workers, ‘blue light’ response teams, shop staff, office workers, hotel employees and passers-by who offered what help they could. The individual acts of bravery and courage are too numerous to list. Often the heroes have been reticent to come forward and have stayed silent about the role they played, known only to those that they helped.”
But the part of this report that I think of most often is the section that explains the fundamental flaw of most emergency plans. We don’t know yet whether this lesson applied today in DC, but it’s worth repeating. I have yet to see a big disaster in which this was not true on some level:
“There is an overarching, fundamental lesson to be learnt from the response to the 7 July attacks, which underpins most of our findings and recommendations. The response on 7 July demonstrated that there is a lack of consideration of the individuals caught up in major or catastrophic incidents. Procedures tend to focus too much on incidents, rather than on individuals and on processes rather than people. Emergency plans tend to cater for the
needs of the emergency and other responding services, rather than explicitly addressing the needs and priorities of the people involved.”








Josh said on June 23, 2009 at 11:01 pm
Unfortunately, this raise the ugly spectre of affirmative action in employment and the removal of standardised testing to ensure racially proportional outcomes. (ie. the Ricci case).
As an example of how the US has done away with testing for political reasons see this example of the Police tests in the US.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1996gerrymandering.pdf
Ilan Kelman said on June 27, 2009 at 1:24 am
We have limited information on the characteristics of the people involved in decision-making that led to this disaster. We have zero information on how and why those people were hired. Yet the above comment implies that we can implicate “affirmative action in employment and the removal of standardised testing to ensure racially proportional outcomes”.
What ever happened to evidence-based thinking?
For an alternative viewpoint, also without much evidence, see http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090626/ap_on_re_us/us_dc_metro_train_derailment which states “The train operator killed this week in a Washington rail crash was a hero who saved lives”.
I make no comment regarding the accuracy or inaccuracy of this news report. I can combine the comment above with this news article in order to demonstrate more lack-of-evidence-based thinking by hypothesising that the driver was hired due to affirmative action and saved lives because of that. This raises the ugly spectre of opportunists using disasters to advance their pre-conceived political agenda, irrespective of evidence available--or, in this case, lack thereof.
hotel basel said on August 11, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Roy is applying for a high paying executive job at the railroad and during the interview,an inspector ask him,"What would you do if you saw two trains were heading towards each other on the same track?”
Roy says,"I would switch one train to another track.” “What if the lever is broke?"asks the inspector.
John said on September 11, 2009 at 10:45 am
This example of truly unfortunate responses to severe accidents raises the question of what actions people need to take after the accident, such as contacting their insurance company and getting legal help.
f you are involved in any sort of accident with injuries, you should contact a lawyer. Here are some great questions to ask:
How long has the practice been in existence?
How many personal injury trials has the lawyer handled and won?
What percentage of the practice focuses on the personal injury area relevant to your case?
Does the lawyer usually represent the victims of accidents in your town or the defendants in personal injury lawsuits?
Can the lawyer outline the lawsuit process clearly?
What is the expected timeline from filing to resolution of a case like yours?
Does the lawyer charge for his/her services regardless of outcome or does he/she only make money if you do?
If the lawyer only takes a cut of a successful settlement (contingency fee), what is that percentage?
Will the lawyer handle your case personally or is it likely to be passed to another attorney at the firm? If the latter is the case, can you meet them?
Does the lawyer think you’ll have any problems winning your case, and what are your options if he/she does?
I hope this information proves useful.
games said on November 20, 2009 at 10:00 am
This example of truly unfortunate responses to severe accidents raises the question of what actions people need to take after the accident, such as contacting their insurance company and getting legal help.
body building supplements said on November 30, 2009 at 7:41 pm
I think that if you are involved in any sort of accident with injuries you need to contact your lawyer immediately because there is a host of reasons why you need to do it.
farmville cheats said on December 07, 2009 at 3:28 am
Yup, lawyer is the first choice when u met some problem.
investment advisor toronto said on December 09, 2009 at 10:50 pm
That is a horrific video. I am amazed by the fact that more people didnt get hurt. And yes you need to speak to a lawyer after such an accident...after you see a doctor of course.
Personal massager said on December 12, 2009 at 4:12 pm
I can see that you are putting a lot of time and effort into your blog and detailed articles! I am deeply in love with every single piece of information you post here. Will be back often to read more updates!
in canada said on January 03, 2010 at 8:50 am
Does the lawyer usually represent the victims of accidents in your town or the defendants in personal injury lawsuits
solve sudoku said on January 19, 2010 at 5:18 am
thansk for the blog
michael arthur said on January 31, 2010 at 7:25 am
That’s a horrible accident but luckily most of the passengers are unhurt. We need to be careful from such accident.